Sunday, April 20, 2014

Nature and Culture Final Paper Draft - Introduction and Background


During the long nineteenth century, there was rarely a place in scientific societies for women. During the age of exploration and expeditions to collect new specimens, the female species seeker was considered a “rare animal for that era”.[1] Most women had to remain in the home during the age of exploration, perhaps enduring their husbands’ inattention to them and their families while they focused most of their energies on their scientific endeavors. Those women who did have interest in science had few ways of expressing that interest. Some women could potentially “provide illustrations for their husbands’ books” or they could “become collectors” and “supply specimens to male scientists”.[2] Most of the male scientists of the age believed that women were incapable of scientific pursuits; Thomas Huxley wrote in a private letter to Charles Lyell that, “five-sixths of women will stop in the doll stage of evolution, to be the stronghold of parsonism, the drag on civilisation, the degradation of every important pursuit in which they mix themselves – intrigues in politics and friponnes in science”.[3] Faced with such prejudices from the male scientists of the day, women had to express their views and opinions on the science of the time in distinctly feminine forms. 

One such woman, Anna Letitia Barbauld, turned to poetry to express her views on the use of animals in scientific experimentation in “The Mouse’s Petition.” Using the language of the transmutation of souls, Barbauld anthropomorphizes a mouse into an eloquent rhetorician. Despite the complex ideas included in the poem, later dispersal of the poem after its initial publication saw its inclusion in school curriculums meant to teach children to be kind to animals. For that reason, Barbauld’s poem became wrapped up into a much larger body of literature, predominantly written by women, that became part of the anti-vivisection movement of the late 19th century in both the United Kingdom and the United States.
           
Anna Letitia Aiken, later Barbauld, was no stranger to science during her adolescence. Her family moved to Warrington, Lancashire in 1758, where her father was employed as a tutor in languages, literature, and divinity at Warrington Academy. Growing up in this academic environment, Barbauld met many intellectuals of the time who were working or studying at the academy, including Reverend Joseph Priestley. Priestly became a tutor of languages at Warrington Academy after Barbauld’s father, John Aikin, left the role to become the tutor of divinity at the school. During Priestley’s employment at the school, Anna became friends with both Rev. Priestley and his wife Mary. Barbauld visited the couple when they lived in Leeds in 1771, during which time she wrote “The Mouse’s Petition” in response to scientific experiments Priestly was conducting.

According to Barbauld’s memoirist, William Turner, Barbauld visited the Priestleys while Joseph was in the middle of his experiments with air that would lead to his discovery of seven different gases including oxygen. Turner wrote that, “In the course of these investigations, the suffocating nature of various gases required to be determined, and no more easy or unexceptional way of making such experiments could be devised, than the reserving of these little victims of domestic economy [i.e., mice], which were thus as easily and as speedily put out of existence, as by any of the more usual modes”.[4] Viewing mice as household vermin that would be killed anyway, Priestly decided to use them in his experiments with air as he had in his previous experiments with electricity. Barbauld was present one evening when “a captive was brought in after supper” by a servant.[5] Priestley decided to keep the mouse in a cage overnight because it was too late to begin any experiments. When the mouse was brought in the next morning, Barbauld’s “petition” in the mouse’s voice was found “twisted among the wires of its cage”.[6] At the conclusion of his account of the event, Turner wrote, “it scarcely need be added, that the petition was successful.”[7] Barbauld had challenged Priestley’s scientific practices using the stereotypical feminine writing form of poetry, allowing her a limited engagement with science.



[1] Conniff 746
[2] Conniff 748-749
[3] Holmes, Guardian Article
[4] The Poems of Anna Letitia Barbauld, 244
[5] Poems 244
[6] Poems 244
[7] Poem 244

No comments:

Post a Comment